Skip navigation

As I expressed, I’m not sold on GroupOn as a business in its current form, and expect it to flame out on a massive scale.  However, I do think the company will be known for one key contribution: it’s lock-in mechanism.  GroupOn’s deals don’t go into effect until a sufficient number of subscribers opt into the deal.  At this point, the lock-in serves little function for GroupOn; all its deals reach the threshold, and I doubt anything would change if it disappeared.  But the lock-in idea is a powerful tool for collective action and has powerful implications across a wide range of businesses.

For instance, combine a lock-in mechanism with real estate.  Part of what drives a person’s decision to live in a particular building/neighborhood/city is whether other individuals are also going to move there.  Right now, it’s hard to know.  But with a lock-in mechanism, a building owner/neighborhood real-estate association/municipal government could offer individuals a way to commit to moving to a certain location only if enough other people do so.

As an example, Detroit is not an attractive destination for people in their twenties.  There are many reasons for this, but one key reason is that Detroit is not an attractive destination for people in their twenties.  If someone in their twenties knew that a large number of people in their twenties were about to move to Detroit, it would become a much more appealing destination.  So suppose the city of Detroit, working with real-estate owners and developers, offers a GroupOn-like deal to non-residents in their twenties, allowing them to buy or rent units in Detroit at a certain low price (Detroit real estate is extremely cheap right now), but the deal only kicks in if 100,000 people sign up.  If fewer people than that sign up, no one is locked in.

But wait, there’s more.  Another reason Detroit may be an undesirable location is because it lacks nice stores/restaurants and good jobs.  The reason it lacks these is that store-owners and employers don’t want to set up shop in Detroit, because there aren’t any good customers or employees there.  Instead, businesses head to a city like Chicago, even thoughts rents are higher, because that’s where the young people are.  This is, again, a collective-action problem, and one that can be addressed through a lock-in mechanism.  Expand the real-estate GroupOn, such that it only kicks in if a) 100,000 people in their twenties move there, b) 300 major employers agree to move into town and higher from the 100,000, and c) 1,000 store owners decide to open up shop.  Residents, employers, and store owners alike can sign up for the deal, but it only goes into effect if all three conditions are met within a certain date.  Otherwise, everyone’s off the hook.

So who will start this business?  I don’t know…maybe GroupOn?


3 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] that necessitates the recalculation (by disrupting the retail sales channel) may be key to resolving it. « – Do Well by Doing Good LikeBe the first to like this […]

  2. By How to Monetize a Blog « Contrarian Moderate on 12 Apr 2011 at 11:21 am

    […] might take effect, but since there’s a real threat of losing something of value, and a lock-in mechanism to prevent people from not getting value from their pledge, it seems like it could work. […]

  3. […] would benefit from moving to warmer climates, but lack the co-ordination to do so, I have a business idea for him.  If he wants to see greater incentives for innovation, I have another idea for him.  And […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: